Mediator Assessment, an object under construction
In studying the work of Hoffmann Jussara on Mediator Assessment, it is believed that it is virtually impossible to assess the way the author proposes. However, in defining the evaluative space and arrows of the way, to paraphrase the author, it is concluded that it is possible to assess from the assumptions made by the students, valuing their buildings, provided there is sufficient clarity on the part of the teacher and that he did not relinquish its role as a leader and organizer of pedagogical and educational activities.
Many teachers believe that if your student is a source of knowledge, albeit hypothetical and invalidated by legislative provisions, while leveling the student himself, as a builder of knowledge, understanding the teacher as a subject under construction, is to invalidate their role social savvy partner, taking into account that learning, teaching and their relationships are established through partnerships built with cognitive, affective and cultural bases.
Then dilute the role of teacher, one who knows everything, the shepherd who leads the sheep. It is clear that the image representation of the teaching is misleading, given that even the own Training Courses are being finalized.
In fact, education is transmissive, the environment is reproductive hierarchical relationships, the relatives of the students expect that the evaluation is given rigidly.
Added to this the possibility of improper appropriation of the ideas of author who can transform the educational environment in total disarray.
In relation to this, to begin with, is incorrect ownership of the Laws of ACE (Statute of Children and Adolescents) by children who see their rights and their duties ever, joining the good intentions of the Law of Spanking, constraining most mothers of fathers rebuke his sons and daughters for fear of punishment in the form of the Law
Used for this, in part, a sad figure who became media for the severity of your case, taken to the extreme barbarism, murder Bernardo boy by his father, for base reasons and the inheritance dispute.
We, average and ordinary citizens, we are not practicing barbarism against our pups to give another spanking or belted, disciplining're at a point where the authority of the father, the mother, the teacher, was diluted and invalidated by mechanisms that meet the "Rights human ". course that Professor can not even dream to rebuke your student has.
For us, it is clear that the child or adolescent can not always defend against ameaçãos about their physical integrity and life. Often we are with the disciplinary actions, protecting them against themselves at a stage where the findings are intense.
The school remains the reproducer of social inequality, according to Bourdieu and Passeron.
Since, by slowing the penalties and rules, approving students and students for the subsequent series without knowing anything, yet they are denied the right to participate equally with the children of the elite, for the Entrance Examination is cutting instrument.
The Mediator Assessment has its developments that allow the teacher to have humility when evaluating. However, they move the theories and laws.
The system remains unchanged for this, is necessary before assessing SET OF WAIST.
To think the rating, you must undress utopias, which are not in the service of quality education, seeking to rescue the system, because the teacher himself, as a subject, can not really against the established foundations of that system is transmissive and breeder.
It is necessary, first of all, to legislate on the issue, pointing out also that the common law are parallel to the common duties.